From: Dominik Dingel <dingel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi all, here is a somehow naive implementation of a reader/writer lock based approch for the parallel deq problem. The next step would be to use it as an introduction example in the text, as due its way of implementation (taking always a read lock, working always with an atomic counter) it is a less efficient way of doing things, compared with the tandem approch. Then the benefits of partitioning might be even more obvious. Thanks Dominik Dominik Dingel (2): CodeSamples: Fix compiler warnings CodeSamples: add read/write solution to the deq example CodeSamples/SMPdesign/Makefile | 5 +- CodeSamples/SMPdesign/deqtorture.h | 2 +- CodeSamples/SMPdesign/lockrwdeq.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ CodeSamples/SMPdesign/locktdeq.c | 4 - CodeSamples/SMPdesign/matmul.c | 3 +- CodeSamples/SMPdesign/matmul_block.c | 3 +- CodeSamples/SMPdesign/smpalloc.c | 1 - 7 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) create mode 100644 CodeSamples/SMPdesign/lockrwdeq.c -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
