Re: [PATCH] Remove a duplicate 'not'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:33:25AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx>

Good catch, applied, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  defer/toyrcu.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/defer/toyrcu.tex b/defer/toyrcu.tex
> index 9ec2963..220dfbe 100644
> --- a/defer/toyrcu.tex
> +++ b/defer/toyrcu.tex
> @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ Despite these shortcomings, one could imagine this variant
>  of RCU being used on small tightly coupled multiprocessors,
>  perhaps as a memory-conserving implementation that maintains
>  API compatibility with more complex implementations.
> -However, it would not not likely scale well beyond a few CPUs.
> +However, it would not likely scale well beyond a few CPUs.
> 
>  The next section describes yet another variation on the reference-counting
>  scheme that provides greatly improved read-side performance and scalability.
> -- 
> 2.2.2
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux