On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:33:25AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx> Good catch, applied, thank you! Thanx, Paul > --- > defer/toyrcu.tex | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/defer/toyrcu.tex b/defer/toyrcu.tex > index 9ec2963..220dfbe 100644 > --- a/defer/toyrcu.tex > +++ b/defer/toyrcu.tex > @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ Despite these shortcomings, one could imagine this variant > of RCU being used on small tightly coupled multiprocessors, > perhaps as a memory-conserving implementation that maintains > API compatibility with more complex implementations. > -However, it would not not likely scale well beyond a few CPUs. > +However, it would not likely scale well beyond a few CPUs. > > The next section describes yet another variation on the reference-counting > scheme that provides greatly improved read-side performance and scalability. > -- > 2.2.2 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html