Re: pam_chauthok and froozen chain problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 02, Dustin Kirkland wrote:

> > Any ideas/opinions/other choices?
> 
> What about a 3-pass system, as opposed to a 2-pass system?
> 
> Pass 1: assert user is allowed to update
> Pass 2: assert this token is okay
> Pass 3: commit
> 
> Rather than freezing the chain after the 1st pass, freeze it after the second?

Which would mean you need to rewrite all existing PAM modules.
That's not an option.

  Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)

_______________________________________________
Pam-list mailing list
Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux for the blind]     [Gimp]

  Powered by Linux