Hallo Hannes, > --- On Mon, 6/23/08, rozelak@xxxxxxxx <rozelak@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > did you just compiled your own pam library to use paths > > from env variables, or did you also do some hacks which > > sould be useful? > > I primarily patched the latest version to obtain pathnames > from environment variables. I also directed system logging > to a file. My aim, however, was to modify the original PAM > code as little as possible, since I want to reduce the > possibility of introducing anomalous behaviors due to the > changes themselves (is that Heisencode? :-). > Great! I absolutely agree with the effort not to affect the ordinary PAM (the code used when PAM is integrated within system). Were the modifications accepted into PAM project? Could you send me the code with your modifications? As for me, I am now more concentrated on unit-testing framework, which would allow to test individual procedures of a module independently on any surrounding. However, some pam-specific stuff must still be initialised - particularly 'pam_handle_t' structure, as module can access functions like 'pam_get_data()', 'pam_set_data()', 'pam_get_user()', 'pam_get_service()' and, of course, logging stuff from PAM library. Therefore, I try to create functions, available for testing only, allowing to pretend that PAM framework is initialised (while it is not in fact, in the case of unit tests), while still allowing to set individual data used within test (the tested functions should not know that they are tested ;-)). So my plan is to create functions: extern int PAM_NONNULL((1)) pam_test_start(pam_handle_t **pamh); extern int PAM_NONNULL((1,2)) pam_test_set_service(pam_handle_t *pamh, const char *service_name); extern int PAM_NONNULL((1,2)) pam_test_set_user(pam_handle_t *pamh, const char *user); extern int PAM_NONNULL((1)) pam_test_end(pam_handle_t *pamh); which can be called from 'setUp()' and 'tearDown()' methods in unit-test suite. Also functions like 'pam_get_data()', 'pam_set_data()', 'pam_get_user()', 'pam_syslog()' and others should be bypassed if necessary. Unfortunately, work goes slowly as I can work on in only 2 hours a week :-( So, if you could send me your modifications, it might save some time for me. Best regards, Dan P.S. One question to core PAM developers: what should I care about in the test-specific adjustments of already existing functions? Of course, I really want to "infect" core PAM library as less as possible! _______________________________________________ Pam-list mailing list Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
