-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Steve, first of all thank you for your feedback. It is very important for me, to get a critical view on my ideas. Steve Langasek schrieb: > Only a handful of non-interactive applications do this. Most applications > correctly forward such requests for information to the user. Of course, you are right. I only looked at non-interactive modules. > But again, if the application /also/ needs to know this information, you > don't seem to have anything particularly pluggable. If the module and > application have to be used together, there's not much point in making a PAM > module at all. I tend to differ. The information I pass will not be mandatory. In the meantime I found another module, which also uses the conversation function to gather more information about the application (Huderos-Project, but it seems to be dead). Do you agree with me, that a module, that uses additional information if it exists (e.g. by calling the conversation function and "ignoring" empty results) is still "pluggable"? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG5Ytx1FY7cmdhGCwRAsBfAJ9/X+KAJ4DhJPI7n9LBQ9Zd3nTg3QCgz4pa JU+FNKkJXj8gD2KiOK0eWL8= =FmD5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pam-list mailing list Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
