On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 07:23:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I'm interested in seeing Linux-PAM as a whole be portable to other systems, > but I don't think you'll have an easy time getting the current Linux-PAM > modules to build cleanly against Solaris libpam; if nothing else, the > pam_syslog() function is one that was long overdue and restoring the poor > per-module code that it was designed to replace sounds like a non-starter > to me. Umm, I think you misunderstand.. my plan was to use the existing code, just pull things like pam_syslog() out of libpam into a separate library (libpam_modutil or something) which could be used on Solaris without including all of the other standard libpam stuff that Solaris already implements.. I haven't looked in great detail into this, but I don't think it should be that big a deal to do this reasonably cleanly.. or am I missing something that would make this function difficult to separate from the other stuff? > > inspection, it doesn't look like this should be too hard.. I've noticed a > > couple of typedefs and library functions (vsprintf, etc) which are missing > > under Solaris, but those should be easy to fix. > > Sorry, did you mean a different function here than vsprintf? I can't find > any references to vsprintf in the current Linux-PAM tree. Yeah, sorry, that was a typo. That should have read "vasprintf".. -alex _______________________________________________ Pam-list mailing list Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
