Re: pam_unix.so + nsswitch.conf + nis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nothing REALLY to do with the topic, but does that mean that my configuration with the +:::::: notation is old and should be updated?

2007/8/22, Thorsten Kukuk < kukuk@xxxxxxx>:
On Wed, Aug 22, Vassilis Vatikiotis wrote:

> The +::::: notation in passwd/shadow filesis used when the 'compat'
> option is used in nsswitch.conf, and I haven't used any 'compat' option
> in nsswitch nor the +/- compatibility notation in passwd and shadow files.
>
> It's not needed anyway since glibc supports NIS lookups. The compat
> option was used when libc5 without NYS support was used in linux, maybe
> a decade ago or something like that.

You are mixing two different things which have nothing to do
together.
libc5 wihtout NYS did not even have a /etc/nsswitch.conf.

And the compat option is not for NIS lookups, it works with
every other service, too.

What you mean is, that the +::::: notation in passwd/shadow files
was used in libc5 without NYS to support NIS, but neither the
+:::: notation nor the compat option is superfluous today.

  Thorsten

--
Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)

_______________________________________________
Pam-list mailing list
Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

_______________________________________________
Pam-list mailing list
Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux for the blind]     [Gimp]

  Powered by Linux