As for me, there seems to be no your fault. It looks like some module in the
module stack just didn't release memory occupied by pam_message structure(s) on
the error returned from your conversation function.
--
Sincerely Your, Dan.
Yeah, seems that. I've tried this code on Debian Etch and there is no leaks at all.
Looks like I have an old version of PAM on my box.
Thansk a lot.
_______________________________________________ Pam-list mailing list Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
