Re: shall a pam-enabled application be setuid root to be able to pam_authenticate system users ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Sebastien Cabaniols <sebastien.cabaniols@xxxxxx>
To: pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:07:20 +0100
Subject: shall a pam-enabled application be setuid root to be able to pam_authenticate system users ?
Hello list,

I am quite new to pam and I have currently managed to integrate pam to a short
hello world application but I don't understand if my application has to run
as root or not:

I have defined a /etc/pam.d/test which contains the following:

auth    required        pam_unix_auth.so
account required        pam_unix_acct.so

My application will start after pam_authenticate succeds (I am simply using
the standard misc_conv from pam_misc.)

If I am running my application on behalf of the non-priviledged user 'seb',
then I can only pam_authenticate the user 'seb'. To be able to authenticate
other users, I have to run the process as root or setuid or sudo.

How can an application (such as a webservice) run on behalf of an
unpriviledged user and still refuse to run if you can't provide a valid
user/password on the linux system ?

Many thanks in advance for any help.

As far as I know, no, you don't. I've run things as my own user and
still been able to authenticate properly. It might have something to
do with your settings for that service; try to assume another
service's identity and authenticate as that instead, and perhaps just
look at other services' configuration files.

Ludvig Ericson

_______________________________________________
Pam-list mailing list
Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux for the blind]     [Gimp]

  Powered by Linux