On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 11:48:36AM -0500, Gary L. Greene, Jr. wrote: > On Friday 26 January 2007 01:34, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 25, Gary L. Greene, Jr. wrote: > > > The following occurs while trying to build version 0.99.7.1: > > > > > > i586-altimatos-linux-gnu-gcc -I../../libpam/include > > > -I../../libpamc/include \ -fPIE -O2 -g -pipe -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > > > -fexceptions -fomit-frame-pointer \ -march=i586 -mtune=pentiumpro > > > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC \ -I/usr/include/db4 -W -Wall > > > -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual \ -Wmissing-declarations > > > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type \ -Wstrict-prototypes > > > -Wwrite-strings -Winline -Wshadow -pie -Wl,--as-needed \ -Wl,-O1 -o > > > pam_timestamp_check pam_timestamp_check-pam_timestamp_check.o > > > pam_timestamp_check-hmacsha1.o pam_timestamp_check-sha1.o > > > > pam_timestamp is not part of Linux-PAM 0.99.7.1. > > > > Thorsten > > Whom should I bug about this then? It's one of RH's added modules from what I > can tell. Just take a guess ;) _______________________________________________ Pam-list mailing list Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list