On Sun, Oct 22, Bjoern Voigt wrote: > Why we don't include the module pam_faildelay in the standard PAM > distribution? This has some benefits: I wrote it more or less new using the extended Linux-PAM functions and wrote some documentation for it. It is now in the Linux-PAM CVS. > * users can find it easier since it's in their distribution > * Linux distributors can configure the applications with fail delay > be default > * the module will be maintained Hm, adding it to Linux-PAM CVS does not mean that it will be maintained. If nobody maintians it, it could be that it will be, at some point, be removed again. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@xxxxxxx SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5 D-90409 Nuernberg -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key fingerprint = 8C6B FD92 EE0F 42ED F91A 6A73 6D1A 7F05 2E59 24BB _______________________________________________ Pam-list mailing list Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
