On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 09:08 +0300, Sysadmin wrote: > Tere. > > > > IMHO this translates to: > > > > +:group1:ALL > > +:group2:172.0.0. > > -:ALL:ALL > > > > > Thank You, almost, but network path didn't work, so now I use: > > +:group1:ALL > +:group2:172. 192. > -:ALL:ALL > > > Btw, I found some old post about different access.conf patch - > http://groups.google.com/group/linux.redhat.pam/browse_frm/thread/7ed3a429d9fb6b6c/f1ee1e4afb48ee26?lnk=st&q=pam_access.so&rnum=7#f1ee1e4afb48ee26 > > I create this simple patch for *pam_access; so* you can specify a diferent > access.conf file for every service (Or the default > /etc/security/access.conf, if not specified). For ex: > > /etc/pam.d/sshd > #specify accessfile > account required /lib/security/*pam_access.so* > accessfile=/etc/security/access.sshd.conf > > /etc/pam.d/login > #default accessfile > account required /lib/security/*pam_access.so* > > This patch isn't anymore available and seems latest pam doesn't include > it, so the question is how to use different rules for different daemon? The accessfile= option is supported by latest PAM. account required pam_access.so accessfile=/etc/security/access.sshd.conf -- Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
