Hi, the LSB PAM test suite expects that pamh can be NULL and the function should not crash. With the current optimizations and usage of nonnull attribute, it seems this is not always true anymore. I know it is debateable if a library should crash in such cases or not and that everybody has another opinion. My question is: Is there any documentation which tells us how a PAM function should behave if the pamh argument is NULL? I cannot find this, even the LSB spec itself says nothing about this. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@xxxxxxx SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5 D-90409 Nuernberg -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE 2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B _______________________________________________ Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
