Re: Linux-PAM 0.99.2.0 released

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 21, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:

> Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > This release is the first version based on autoconf, automake and
> > libtool which is declared as "stable" by the Authors.
> 
> This implies that portability is a priority (despite the
> Linux-PAM name).  I don't get a clean build on Solaris, although
> I would like to.
> 
> If I spend the time doing the clean-up, is there a reasonable
> chance of getting the changes included in the distribution?

If you look at the ChangeLog, you will see that we integrated patches
for Solaris and MacOS X with this release, too.

So yes, we care about portability, but it does not have a high
priority as we are only able to test on Linux. But if somebody creates
clean patches (Not a cascade of OS specific "ifdefs") we will of course
discuss and apply them.

  Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk         http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/      kukuk@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH       Maxfeldstr. 5       D-90409 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------    
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE  2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B

_______________________________________________

Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux for the blind]     [Gimp]

  Powered by Linux