-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 shad wrote: >> But why? Sounds like a bad idea to me. > That's not the question. The only way I can help you properly is to understand what you're trying to do! > After many searchs, i decided to read the pam changelog : > --- > 0.78: Do Nov 18 14:48:36 CET 2004 > * pam_limits: applied patch to allow explicit limits for root > and remove limits on su. (from debian - toady) Enjoy. Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQ1Po2egNmph0Y1E2AQJVwg//Wc2pStlGL1PjriFHmOv+w/h+KMKs5/Ra Rg3OBIfK0CNaWZhqJNHGXAzEO5kd8OzC3ukyAKyTqMUD3UKg2fS3qSjkl/bOrbCs DSJfd5p6TyOoJhfc3BZS7DnFRFcPTuNuCQSleaZf0QOmH4sXuflQHSzvT4Hj9rZu 8EharBCQQE6r3dFkLoCbvd1t+lSmFqXn62lfvpyUgaIZ/18tn25vhwzKZ1NfMtuz xsRyfZFOlXbig86qE8YusYhUF3NM7wdWwit37RkTOg9C0NQpYmjSzpsYrMBLqxbe /FvGVbD929jwNRVCb/fbLrOJiycaYJAO3Un3LxemNrkIQ1lK9J9kWu8J9NhxiwxT kVaRq8gvnGOheYmomBMn503U4ETrRLLy9ilFbslwzt20SPsbsKyEAW5phG0mGt4T DIrBgNFt6XSDORPD+RmHRucqTr96dBdHoWrR5pW9Ly6k91MLohZ5mcWo3EaEg4TO MVni0mJCNGqZCDZ28049MyQJhAz9lxWJ8CVe5nu4cJg446KSr6CsZKtK6ITEUB0b ZucNfz7B0q34Owu7arPHKafeF2FVsOp9k8c5N852kG5mfNsGw/IX1uNA8z6hGozs rM/xRLq696PllDcODLrfeXJTYh4GbHf65wsCUud/vHG4fbGtlKlUj4bTst1zET+I kX4JURQDdw4= =EZP5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
