On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 02:37:18PM -0400, Chris Jackson wrote: > I don't think you need to patch glibc tho', patches to pam should be > enough. > http://members.hellug.gr/nmav/bcrypt/index.html That's quite true for some installs(*), but in my opinion it constitutes even more of a hack than local patches to glibc are. (*) Not for all installs because many have apps which need password hashing but don't go via PAM, often for a good reason. -- Alexander _______________________________________________ Pam-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
