Ahhh! This makes sense to me. Well, perhaps I can beg mark to write this into his server. :) Thank you again! Mike Gerdts wrote: > On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 13:33, Terry Davis wrote: > >>Well, I am still stumped on this. Is it up to the server to call >>certain aspects of pam? Like, is it possible that uw-imapd is simply >>ignoring what pam is saying about pam_mkhomedir? I would really >>appreciate any help on this matter. >> >>Thank you! >> > > A quick look at pam_mkhomedir shows: > > % nm pam_mkhomedir.so | grep pam_sm > 00001500 T pam_sm_close_session > 00001410 T pam_sm_open_session > > A quick look at the imapd source (from pine4.33) shows: > > % find imap -name \*.c | xargs grep pam_open > <no output> > > Since imapd never calls pam_open_session(), libpam never calls > pam_sm_open_session(), and as such pam_mkhomedir is never called. > > Mike > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pam-list@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list > -- Terry Davis Systems Administrator BirdDog Solutions, Inc. (402) 829-6059 www.birddog.com
