Re: PAM_IGNORE (was Re: Why should setcred be called after session open?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:33:48PM -0400, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> I disagree. It's always appropriate to return PAM_IGNORE because it
> cannot contribute to success of the stack.

Let me correct this so it matches what I've been saying:

"It's never inappropriate for a module to return PAM_IGNORE if it cannot
perform the given function because doing so cannot contribute to success
of the PAM stack."

Cheers,

Nico
--





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux for the blind]     [Gimp]

  Powered by Linux