No. I believe responses are handled in the same way in all PAM implementations. The argument: (... , struct pam_response **resp, ...) is a pointer to a pointer to an array. The module provides the value (*resp), so there is only one way that the response array can be constructed by the conversation function. Cheers Andrew Nicolas Williams wrote: > > Does this problem extend to the handling of responses? > > Nico > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 04:14:32PM -0800, Andrew Morgan wrote: > > Yes, this is a known problem. (I recently [months ago] submitted a patch > > to openssh to cover this issue - someone 'fixed' the original PAM code > > to stop working like the Linux library and start working like the > > Solaris one - I explained the difference then, and Damien added some > > conditional compilation to cover it.) > > [...] > > > Cheers > > > > Andrew > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Pam-list@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
