Re: autoconf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "David" == David Lee <T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk> writes:

> On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 05:46:59PM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:

> Approach 1:  (Andrew Morgan): minimal change.  The only Makefile to be
> changed (i.e. renamed into "Makefile.in" and minor editing) is the
> top-level one.  All other Makefiles left alone. 

> Approach 2:  (Steve Langasek and me): change all Makefiles (rename and
> minor editing). 

What about Approach 3, which is one step more than Approach 2. Use
Automake. If readability is the goal, then I highly recommend using
Automake. Automake makefiles are very small and readable.  

Ganesan


-- 
R. Ganesan (rganesan@novell.com)       | Ph: 91-80-5721856 Ext: 2149
Novell India Development Center.       | #include <std_disclaimer.h>





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux for the blind]     [Gimp]

  Powered by Linux