On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:18:17PM +1000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > consider this: in the light of the existence of secure transports, is it > > > in fact pam's job to propose modifications to protocols to provide secure > > > alternatives to those protocols? > > > I think the question is incorrect. Noone is proposing to modify > > protocols with PAM; certainly not me. Eeek. Not _I_. > just raising the point so that it's clearer, by contrast, what _is_ being > proposed. :) thanks, sorry, my repsonse came out a bit blunt... Nico --
