On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Steve Langasek wrote: > [...] > > There are a lot of things you have to implement yourself if you want your code > to be portable. We're going to run into the same issue soon in Linux-PAM, > because a number of people think that Linux-PAM /should/ be more portable. > > [...] Indeed. Steve: Could you indicate what portability progress has been made? There was a flurry of activity a few weeks ago at http://pam.sourceforge.net/"; but nothing seems to have happened since then. (My own perspective is wanting to use some of the PAM modules on Solaris, and I have a set of portability changes that I'd like to see integrated into the the sourceforge CVS .) -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : University of Durham : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/~dcl0tdl South Road : : Durham : : Phone: +44 191 374 2882 U.K. :
