On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Tony den Haan wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 04, Tony den Haan wrote: > > In Linux-PAM, libpam_misc schould be linked against libpam. That is > > a minor Linux-PAM bug which has no real effect in practice, because > > i wasn't sure what you meant, and went for > > ./configure --disable-dynamic > > which, to my surprise, *did* produce a libpam_misc.so, which was > statically linked itself, and shadow actually built... uhm, that's what i thought anyway, i must have been dreaming what's the proper way? tony
