Matt Caswell wrote in <15344cfb-ca5d-4413-b007-4481ea91ce5c@xxxxxxxxxxx>: ... |This is how EVP_DigestSign() is implemented: | |https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/21bcae6561d73e629f11e19975f24283\ |559d36c0/crypto/evp/m_sigver.c#L579-L610 | |As you can see from the above, what it does is first check for the |availability of a "digest_sign" function in the fetched signature |algorithm. If it exists it calls it. However, if it does not exist for Users need a possibility to transparently gain knowledge of which code path has to be taken. I cannot transparently implement this, i need to hardcode something. (Yes, i did how i said in the past, ie, trying to establish message-digest, and take the other code path if that did not work, but whether that is the approach to do it was only a guessing.) This is at odds with what SSL_CONF_cmd() is trying to achieve (to some extend, at least). --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "openssl-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openssl-users+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/openssl.org/d/msgid/openssl-users/20240814182316.fmJVKwcR%40steffen%25sdaoden.eu.