> Now I treat the flush as 'OpenSSL isn't interested in the result
> of the last write anymore'. I'm not sure this assumption is correct,
> but it seems to work... (Well, it could cause duplicate messages
It does not sound correct.
Might be true for a read.
But, for a write, I'd think it would mean fflush().
What do your BIO functions do for UDP that the existing set of UDP BIO don't
do? I have outstanding patches here.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
