Hello! When you inspect the following key with ‘openssl pkey’, it works fine: -----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY----- MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC9oaro18Mt4FITtXvhy/v2N0d0 aQJ285MgstG5QSgvFnXA+7Bww20hnLQZD4vOZbeIhdu4g5s8S6LWczqswDjVyD97 9j+RcZM+JcnHPEIvkn7YCKYnM3mvSQKmeRtm9kDVL0waKf+iZ5ZDYiLcfXCSIDnT 2SMxp3D9UNEfEZDMoQIDAQABMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDK A5hv8tKZBw3cx+j0NMrbsOY5QfoUtxGeXjmGI89q63iFxBdSgrJW5wpthZfHcVHl roPW885ToeSrEdyUIVCokR7L8PP7Up0PGXUDPIFCQB7+jVV8ezLyxHSLGT81u7Be el5ybAgsal/GmhpeQXcEpnYpiqVcHL3XTlY8+34EQQIDAQAB -----END PUBLIC KEY----- However, there is something odd about it, openssl seems to be interested only in the first half of the key data: $ openssl pkey -pubin -in thekey.pem -text -----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY----- MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC9oaro18Mt4FITtXvhy/v2N0d0 aQJ285MgstG5QSgvFnXA+7Bww20hnLQZD4vOZbeIhdu4g5s8S6LWczqswDjVyD97 9j+RcZM+JcnHPEIvkn7YCKYnM3mvSQKmeRtm9kDVL0waKf+iZ5ZDYiLcfXCSIDnT 2SMxp3D9UNEfEZDMoQIDAQAB -----END PUBLIC KEY----- Public-Key: (1024 bit) Modulus: 00:bd:a1:aa:e8:d7:c3:2d:e0:52:13:b5:7b:e1:cb: fb:f6:37:47:74:69:02:76:f3:93:20:b2:d1:b9:41: 28:2f:16:75:c0:fb:b0:70:c3:6d:21:9c:b4:19:0f: 8b:ce:65:b7:88:85:db:b8:83:9b:3c:4b:a2:d6:73: 3a:ac:c0:38:d5:c8:3f:7b:f6:3f:91:71:93:3e:25: c9:c7:3c:42:2f:92:7e:d8:08:a6:27:33:79:af:49: 02:a6:79:1b:66:f6:40:d5:2f:4c:1a:29:ff:a2:67: 96:43:62:22:dc:7d:70:92:20:39:d3:d9:23:31:a7: 70:fd:50:d1:1f:11:90:cc:a1 Exponent: 65537 (0x10001) Well, that key actually contains two, concatenated SubjectPublicKeyInfos! I noticed this when I first used a different library, and processing failed. • Is openssl right in accepting this key? Why does it use only the first one? • Is the other library wrong in rejecting this key? • Do relevant RFCs say something about such a ‘concatenated’ format? Cheers, -- David