Hiya, A question (hence sending to -users) and a comment (hence sending to feedback too:-) - Q: Will the feedback received also be published? Seems like a good idea to do that (and consistent with the draft text). I'd be fine if that were done including or excluding any spam submissions. - comment: I'm not sure if it belongs in a mission statement but I'd opine that the project could do with some better way of handling some experimental work, e.g. I'm working on a fork for ECH, others exist for e.g. PQC stuff. In itself that's probably too fine-grained a thing to put in a mission statement, but maybe some nod to a goal of timliness for features that are widely agreed to be desirable for future releases could be useful. Cheers, S. On 31/03/2023 10:08, Hugo Landau wrote:
OpenSSL has produced a new draft mission & values statement. Once finalised, we intend to realign all activities of the project to ensure they reflect our agreed mission and values. Before doing so however, we would like to obtain feedback on this statement from the public, to ensure it represents all of our communities. By offering us your feedback, you will help us to ensure the OpenSSL project is run in a way that reflects the values of all of our users. Please ensure you submit your feedback by 14th April 2023. For further information on the draft mission & values statement and details on how to submit feedback, please see: https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/03/31/mission/
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
