RE: OpenSSL Security Advisory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <openssl@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <openssl-project@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <openssl-announce@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: OpenSSL Security Advisory
From: <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:12:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <ZBsjks1GFyACuyhx@dev.openssl.org>
Organization: Nexbridge Inc.
References: <ZBsjks1GFyACuyhx@dev.openssl.org>
Reply-to: rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 11:50 AM Tomas Mraz wrote:
<snip>
>OpenSSL 3.1 users should upgrade to 3.1.1.
>OpenSSL 3.0 users should upgrade to 3.0.9.
>OpenSSL 1.1.1 users should upgrade to 1.1.1u.
>OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2zh (premium support customers
only).

Is there an ETA for 3.1.1, 3.0.9, 1.1.1u in the github repo?

Thanks,
Randall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory
  - From: Tomas Mraz

References:
- OpenSSL Security Advisory
  - From: Tomas Mraz

Prev by Date: OpenSSL Security Advisory
Next by Date: Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory
Previous by thread: OpenSSL Security Advisory
Next by thread: Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux