Re: run-checker NO DGRAM and test cases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 05:24 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Tomas Mraz <tomas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>     >> Should the test *ALSO* ifdef itself out if OPENSSL_NO_DGRAM is
>     >> defined?
> 
>     > No, that's not necessary as they won't be built at all with the
>     > build.info change above.
> 
> I didn't find this to be true.  The source file still got built, and
> linked,
> and that failed.
> 
> I had to add an ifdef to the source file.  Please see:
> https://github.com/mcr/openssl/commit/2ae78377969d939d5eedc39ca0c22d914f739e93
> 
> Perhaps my use of:
>     IF[{- !$disabled{dgram} -}]
> 
> is wrong in some way.

You've included the bio_write_test and bio_read_test also on the bare
PROGRAMS{noinst} assignment. You need to remove them from there.
Interestingly the http_test is included there as well which means it
will also be always compiled.

-- 
Tomáš Mráz, OpenSSL





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux