RE: “EC PUBLIC KEY”

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx" <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: “EC PUBLIC KEY”
From: Michael Wojcik <Michael.Wojcik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:21:36 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
In-reply-to: <CAFeDd5Y=LNs0dTRcwXvSyduLfVAYY9C7RNuZAcH=Z6wMp08Q7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <711B8485-155D-411E-A617-33192A2BBC14@felipegasper.com> <DM6PR18MB27007808FA0BAD8990750035F99A9@DM6PR18MB2700.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> <CAFeDd5Y=LNs0dTRcwXvSyduLfVAYY9C7RNuZAcH=Z6wMp08Q7w@mail.gmail.com>

> From: openssl-users <openssl-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Billy
> Brumley
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 November, 2021 12:40
> To: openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: “EC PUBLIC KEY”
> 
> That's an ed25519 key. Not an ECC key. They are different formats, at
> both the OID and asn1 structure levels.

Oh, of course you're right. Apologies.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- RE: “EC PUBLIC KEY”
  - From: Michael Wojcik

References:
- “EC PUBLIC KEY”
  - From: Felipe Gasper
- RE: “EC PUBLIC KEY”
  - From: Michael Wojcik
- Re: “EC PUBLIC KEY”
  - From: Billy Brumley

Prev by Date: Re: “EC PUBLIC KEY”
Next by Date: RE: “EC PUBLIC KEY”
Previous by thread: Re: “EC PUBLIC KEY”
Next by thread: RE: “EC PUBLIC KEY”
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux