On September 9, 2021 3:26 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: >To: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Cc: 'Benjamin Kaduk' <bkaduk@xxxxxxxxxx>; openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag? > >Randall S. Becker wrote in > <012201d7a590$56df08d0$049d1a70$@nexbridge.com>: > |On September 9, 2021 6:56 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > |>Benjamin Kaduk wrote in > |> <20210908233639.GY19992@xxxxxxxxxx>: > |>|On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 01:03:28AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > ... > |>|I think (off the top of my head, i.e., without consulting a reference) \ |>| |that `git log` (which your aliases end up at) will only >|display |>|signatures on commits, but will not show the tag objects themselves. > |>|`git show` does display the tag object, and for openssl only the \ |>|tag |object is what is signed; the commits themselves are not >|signed. > |> > |>I see. That is a logical one, thanks for the explanation. > ... > |$ git tag --verify openssl-3.0.0 > >Yes yes, ok! But like i said, wouldn't it be nice if at least release commits would be signed also, a.k.a./or when a new branch is created? >In Linux for example the merge commits to the master branch are signed, in addition to the tags of the actual releases. >It may even be a deja vu and i may have clamoured in the past. Strictly speaking, the signature on a tag is considered immutable and transitively applies the signature to the commit (it does not really, but the effect is the same). The signature on a tag becomes invalid if the underlying commit, or parents of that commit in git's Merkel Tree changes, so it is quite a strong signature. AFIAK, adding a signature to the commit itself does not really improve the strength of the signing (much), unless one implements a multi-signature structure - like the commit and signatures on three tags on the same commit. You have then implemented a three-signature authority, which basically is a Blockchain-style authority (not quite - I used "-style"), providing that you do trust the signers. I think the word for that is "over-kill" 😉, but maybe not in the case of OpenSSL. -Randall