Just for the record:
On 26/03/21 09:51, Embedded Devel wrote:
i now have a second developer looking at this, so hoping he can sort
it all out.
[...]
I was that second developer and even though 'Embedded Devel' listed this
as "paid" work and even though he made repeated promises about following
up on payment, I never did receive payment.
I checked the email address and IP addresses used for this job and found
nothing terribly wrong. My conclusion is that either someone hijacked an
email address - meaning that Optimcloud is not a very *safe* company to
do business with - or that 'Embedded Devel' at Optimcloud simply thinks
he can get away with this - meaning that Optimcloud is not a very
*trustworthy* company to do business with.
You have been warned.
JJK
On 26/03/21 09:51, Embedded Devel wrote:
i believe this was all from back in the 0.9x days, the code in
question is close to 10+/- years old
if everyone would look at the email thread re: "ssl client write /
server accept seems broken"
some might see more of the issue i am facing, i have has 1 person look
at this and he believes
quote "
This looks like using *very* outdated OpenSSL API. Hence the SSL
client (and server) code needs to ported to work with more recent
versions OpenSSL and make use of TLS methods instead of SSL methods.
For testing you could try to build OpenSSL with the old SSL3 support
enabled (we don't even support that at all in OpenWrt any longer, but
should work to build manually).
Because ssl_undefined_function is most likely a result of:
Disabled features:
...
ssl3 [default] OPENSSL_NO_SSL3
ssl3-method [default] OPENSSL_NO_SSL3_METHOD
...
If you find someone very familiar with OpenSSLs API (I've used it, more
than once, but it's not what I'm doing every day), this can be done in
a few days. I'd probably need a week for this and I'm not particularly
keen on it, there are things I'm better with which are waiting as well."
i now have a second developer looking at this, so hoping he can sort
it all out.
