Re: Fwd: channel binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/01/2021 08:20, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Current recommendations are not to use the finished message as the channel
binding but instead to define key exporter label for the given usage
(see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8446#section-7.5), using SSL_export_keying_material().

Follow-on question on SSL_export_keying_material() -
what "label" should I supply?

I need to interwork with other implementations that are using
SSL_get_finished() (client side) / SSL_get_peer_finished() (server side).
Does that imply I should use "client finished"
(per
https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xhtml#exporter-labels
)
as the label?   Does the label length for the SSL_export_keying_material()
call include the terminating NUL or not?
--
Cheers,
  Jeremy



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux