Re: Fencepost errors in certificate and OCSP validity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 04:32:56PM +0100, Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote:

> Recently, the EJBCA developers publicly warned (via the Mozilla root store
> policy mailing list) other CA vendors that they had incorrectly implemented
> the handling of the "notAfter" X509 field, resulting in certificates that
> lasted 1 second longer than intended.

I think that's patently ridiculous.  I'm inclined to dismiss any bug
reports along these lines with prejudice.

-- 
    Viktor.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux