Re: Real MTU problems with BIO pair

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-08-20 21:44, Detlef Vollmann wrote:
if I create a BIO pair with
   BIO_new_bio_pair(&int_bio, 0, &ext_bio_, 0);

then I tried to use SSL_set_mtu(), DTLS_set_link_mtu()
and SSL_CTX_set_max_send_fragment(ctx, 1000).
None of them gave me an error, but also none of them worked:
the ServerHello was still sent as a single packet (>1500 bytes).
It turned out that this was not true: it actually were two
packets but written to the BIO together before SSL_accept()
returned, so my side of the bio pair got on a BIO_read()
one single big packet and sent it to the socket and the wire
as one UDP packet.

If I create the BIO pair using
   BIO_new_bio_pair(&int_bio, 1000, &ext_bio_, 1000);
then the ServerHello is fragmented, but not into DTLS
handshake fragments, but just into separate UDP packets,
that neither s_client nor my own client can work with.

Is there any way to set the maximum fragment size for
DTLS handshake with a BIO pair?
One solution is to set the MTU and the int_bio size to
exactly the same value.
Another option would be to use BIO_set_callback_ex() and send
the data to the socket after each BIO_write() into int_bio,
but the problem here is that BIO_set_data() cannot be used
as the ptr is already used for the peer address.

  Detlef



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux