Re: liblegacy.a does not work unless compiled with -static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I’ve been wondering if an option to build the legacy provider into libcrypto (like the null and default providers) is worthwhile.

Given this conservation, it seems it might be.


Pauli
-- 
Dr Paul Dale | Distinguished Architect | Cryptographic Foundations 
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia




On 2 May 2020, at 5:30 pm, Richard Levitte <levitte@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 01 May 2020 19:22:13 +0200,
Salz, Rich via openssl-users wrote:

Hm, so DSO support is a requirement for legacy crypto now?  That
probably needs to be made explicit, and see if the project gets
pushback.

No.  When DSO support is turned off, the legacy provider code becomes
part of libcrypto, in an inaccessible state (in other words, you still
have to "load" it).

Cheers,
Richard

--
Richard Levitte         levitte@xxxxxxxxxxx
OpenSSL Project         http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux