1.OU or OU.1 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: openssl-users <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 1.OU or OU.1 ?
From: "Salz, Rich via openssl-users" <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:12:08 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Reply-to: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802

The doc/man5/config.pod file says to use

1.OU = “My first OU”

2.OU = “My second OU”

But doc/man5/x509v3_config.pod says to append the numeric, as in

email.1 = steve@here

email.2 = steve@there

I believe the second form is correct. Can anyone confirm?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1.OU or OU.1 ?
  - From: Richard Levitte
- Re: 1.OU or OU.1 ?
  - From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik

Prev by Date: Re: OpenSSL server sending certificate chain(inc. root cert) during handshake
Next by Date: Re: 1.OU or OU.1 ?
Previous by thread: An idiosyncratic port of OpenSSL 1.1.1e to OS/400 ILE
Next by thread: Re: 1.OU or OU.1 ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux