Re: Naming of methods in RSA_METHOD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Naming of methods in RSA_METHOD
From: Rafael Ferrer <eureka6676@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 16:11:54 +0800
In-reply-to: <a84cbed2-2cd6-44db-c5a2-e4e0243d93ac@gmail.com>
References: <a84cbed2-2cd6-44db-c5a2-e4e0243d93ac@gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

> Though the RSA_sign function signature doesn't seem to allow specifying
the padding.

Sorry I meant the hashing algorithm.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Re: Naming of methods in RSA_METHOD
  - From: Rafael Ferrer

Prev by Date: Re: Naming of methods in RSA_METHOD
Next by Date: Re: aes_cbc_hmac_sha1 implementation
Previous by thread: Re: Naming of methods in RSA_METHOD
Next by thread: Are RAND_bytes and RAND_priv_bytes thread safe?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux