Re: OpenSSL 3.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For option 2, we have a support contract in place. But does this actually help us as far as the FIPS Object Module?



From: openssl-users <openssl-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Neptune <pdrotter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 8:56 PM
To: openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0
 
You essentially have three choices:
1. Stay on the 1.0.2 branch to continue FIPS compliance, but go the entire
year without support or security patches.
2. Pay OpenSSL for a premium support contract ($50,000 per year) to continue
to receive patches on 1.0.2 for the remainder of the year.
3. Pay SafeLogic for support contract to receive 1.0.2 security patches
through the year. Cost is roughly half what OpenSSL is asking, but you may
be able to negotiate.

These are the only options of which I am aware.




--
Sent from: http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/OpenSSL-User-f3.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux