On 06/07/2019 16:30, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> They would have to get their own validation, their own lab to verify, etc., etc.You are correct. My statement, which was technically incorrect, is more likely to be realistic :)That seems to contradict the other answer, which is that legally, the FIPS cannister (properly built) can be used with any software outside the cryptographic boundary, the soon-to-be-deprecated OpenSSL 1.0.2 library just being the normal default.The point is that some people may soon be in a desperate need to find aFIPS-capable replacement for OpenSSL 1.0.x.It seems to me that the easiest thing to do is maintain that release of OpenSSL by themselves.
Which would be another variation of such unofficial work.
If someone is thinking of fitting OpenSSL 1.1.x to become a user of the existing FOM, then they will probably find it easier to, well, just maintain what currently works. Just because something is past "end of life" does not mean that anyone's ability to use it is revoked. It just means that keeping it working is their responsibility. Anyone can use the FOM until it expires (sunsets is the term used), which lasts one year beyond 1.0.2 as I recall. See https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2018/05/18/new-lts/ for some more information on this.
That policy page is half the problem, the other half being the decision not to make a FIPS module for the current 1.1.x series. Enjoy Jakob -- Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. https://www.wisemo.com Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10 This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors. WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded
