Re: Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ramakrushna mishra <rama.krushna7@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1
From: "Salz, Rich via openssl-users" <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 15:13:14 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx" <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAHgr=kJx0JtTee5qFqKiULudNVhkB2DkRaNnQ_us5S7J-d1Pog@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHgr=kJUK_x6BBcmGGBRPuU0KcmCuv+2jhM1NMqyY9vLBsb+iA@mail.gmail.com> <A496D202-588A-4747-A9A2-87E2FE712061@akamai.com> <CAHgr=kJx0JtTee5qFqKiULudNVhkB2DkRaNnQ_us5S7J-d1Pog@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.19.0.190502

So now you know where to start looking, I guess. You might also change your test program so that it calls the functions multiple times, to “smooth out” the overhead.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1
  - From: ramakrushna mishra

References:
- Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1
  - From: ramakrushna mishra
- Re: Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1
  - From: Salz, Rich via openssl-users
- Re: Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1
  - From: ramakrushna mishra

Prev by Date: Re: Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1
Next by Date: Re: X509v3 SAN names length question
Previous by thread: Re: Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1
Next by thread: Re: Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux