Re: openssl-users: DKIM, DMARC and all that jazz, and what it means to us

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:51:09 +0100,
Jakob Bohm wrote:
> Having a DMARC record without DKIM signatures (including DKIM
> signing mails relayed with openssl.org as From: address) is either
> an RFC violation or very close to one.

I suspected that.  We're not quite ready for full blown DKIM yet, so
I'll remove the DMARC record for now.

Thank you.

(I know that you have sent other recommendations, but haven't read
them yet...  be assured that I will give them consideration)

Cheers,
Richard

-- 
Richard Levitte         levitte@xxxxxxxxxxx
OpenSSL Project         http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux