On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 06:40:05PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 1/18/19 1:53 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > > Going in circles trying to compile 1.1.1a with strict C99 and no > > optimizations and with a ready to debug and single step resultant > > library. > > Ignore all this. Thou shalt not C99 here. Our code base is currently C89/C90, with some extenions, but things like gcc default to something like "gnu99", "gnu11" or "gnu17". And we actually make use of some of those extensions not in C89. The ones I know about: - asm(): Most of those should go away if you define PEDANTIC. I think the only exception is code we compile when gcc is used. - strdup() and strcasecmp() which are in POSIX, but not in C - Setting the mutex type, which seems to be UNIX98 or XOPEN2K8 - isascii: XOPEN - usleep: Was in POSIX, has been replaced by nanosleep - long long: Since C99 Then we also use things like int32_t, but define the type ourself if the compiler is C89. We detect C11 support for atomics. Anyway, if you have a good patch to remove things that are no longer in a standard, and it also works with older systems, I suggest submit a patch. Kurt -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
