Hi Matt,
Thanks a lot for the reply. After calling ASYNC_pause_job() from the engine, control will transfer to the place where we start the ASYNC_start_job right? So how can we write the code to put a trigger on fd in the same thread? If I am wrong please correct me. Also if u can suggest where resume operation should be done, it would be helpful.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:11 PM Matt Caswell <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/01/2019 09:39, Ananthu Unnikrishnan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are not able to access the waitctx address from the job address using
> ASYNC_get_wait_ctx(job) from a thread which starts in the bind section of the
> dynamic engine. The job address is the same as that we got
> using ASYNC_get_current_job. Can anyone help on this?
It's very unclear from the your various emails what you are trying to achieve
and the problem that you are experiencing.
>From the above it sounds like you are starting threads from inside your dynamic
engine? ASYNC_JOBs are always local to a thread. When a job is started it is
associated with the current thread. So ASYNC_get_current_job() returns the job
associated with the current thread. Similarly if you pause a job,
ASYNC_pause_job() must be called from that same thread. Finally if you restart a
paused job it must also be restarted on the same thread.
If you are starting new threads from within your engine then extreme care must
be taken to obey the above rules - otherwise you are likely to get strange results.
Matt
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:26 AM Ananthu Unnikrishnan <ananthuu741@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:ananthuu741@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Can anyone please help on this? If u need any additional information please
> let me know.
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:25 PM Ananthu Unnikrishnan <ananthuu741@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:ananthuu741@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Adding more details to the previous mail. We have edited the OpenSSL
> code for implementing the polling for changed fd's as in OpenSSL speed
> command. Attached the code snippet of the same along with this mail.
> Mentioned below some observations which found doubtful:
>
> 1) We have got prints in ASYNC_FINISH case, before getting print in
> ASYNC_PAUSE case. Attaching the log also, so you can understand easily.
> 2) Shown below the code snippet which we have written to provide a write
> on fd.
>
> if ((waitctx = ASYNC_get_wait_ctx((ASYNC_JOB *)job)) == NULL) {
> printf("In dynamic engine | waitctx == NULL : %d\n", __LINE__);
> return ret;
> }
>
> printf("\n----- In dynamic engine | After pausing | job is %lx |
> waitctx in resume job %lx |-----\n", job, waitctx);
>
> if ((ret = ASYNC_WAIT_CTX_get_fd(waitctx, engine_id, &efd,
> &custom)) > 0) {
> if (write(efd, &buf, sizeof(uint64_t)) == -1) {
> printf("\nFailed to write\n");
> }
> }
>
> Here waitctx is getting NULL when we tried to fetch waitctx using
> ASYNC_get_wait_ctx(). We have printed data of sizeof(ASYNC_JOB) ie.1176
> bytes contained in the job address from the engine, we got correct data
> before calling ASYNC_pause() and but got half data zero data when we
> tried to access the same address after ASYNC_pause().
>
> Attaching both job structure contents before and after calling
> ASYNC_pause(). Also, we got the correct data in the same address when we
> have printed from ssl_start_async_job() before polling starts, where we
> have started the async_job
> .
> The prints starting with "In dynamic engine" are prints inside the
> engine, rest prints are from ss/ssl_lib.c. Kindly check this and please
> point out if anything is wrong somewhere. Thanks in advance.
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 10:30 AM Ananthu Unnikrishnan
> <ananthuu741@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:ananthuu741@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We have implemented a dynamic engine and tested in the async
> mode using OpenSSL speed command. But in a real network scenario, we
> have seen only starting the async_job(in file ssl/ssl_lib.c,
> function: ssl_start_async_job) in the OpenSSL. We haven't seen
> polling async_fd's for resuming the job as in apps/speed.c(in speed
> command case).
> So can anyone please suggest any solution for resuming the
> async_jobs in real network scenario? Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> With best Regards,
>
> Ananthu
>
>
>
>
> --
> With best Regards,
>
> Ananthu
>
>
>
>
> --
> With best Regards,
>
> Ananthu
>
>
>
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
--
With best Regards,
-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
