On 08/23/2018 09:00 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 20:08 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/22/2018 11:48 AM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 22/08/18 00:53, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/21/2018 06:31 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 21/08/18 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Thanks!
Once Fedora beta picks this up, I will run my scripts against
it and see
if all cases of hash with ED25519 are fixed.
Unfortunately the command line usability changes for this
didn't make it
into the beta. They should still be in the final release.
Sigh. That means you will get it right. Right? :)
Change seems simple enough.
The relevant change has now been merged to master.
Fedora had already built pre9.1. But on the off chance, I will look
at
it with tomorrow's build.
I'm sorry but no, I am not updating Fedora with current git tree
checkout. You'll have to wait for the next prerelease or the final
version if there are no further prereleases.
Tomas,
Thanks for responding here.
I have been preparing an Internet Draft on how to build an ED25519 pki.
I know have the choice of:
building my own 1.1.1 pre9 for testing.
Wait to push the draft out until 1.1.1 is fully released.
Fudge the draft by adding yet another caveat (yes there is a caveat
section that I developed in creating the ECDSA pki draft) that the
commands are for how it is suppose to work in production 1.1.1, not what
I had to do in the prerelease.
Decisions decisions. Thing is I want the draft out so I can push for
EDDSA support in IEEE 802.1AR with the next meeting early Sept.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
