Re: [openssl-project] Late thoughts on the 1.1.1 release - are we fooling ourselves?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: angus@xxxxxxxxxxxx, openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [openssl-project] Late thoughts on the 1.1.1 release - are we fooling ourselves?
From: Juan Isoza <jisoza@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 19:48:21 +0200
In-reply-to: <memo.20180817134713.7880A@magsys.adsl.magsys.co.uk>
References: <20180817.135513.218041365083823947.levitte@openssl.org> <memo.20180817134713.7880A@magsys.adsl.magsys.co.uk>
Reply-to: openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

What is the difference between draft 28 and rfc for tls 1.3 ?

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [openssl-project] Late thoughts on the 1.1.1 release - are we fooling ourselves?
  - From: Hubert Kario
- Re: [openssl-project] Late thoughts on the 1.1.1 release - are we fooling ourselves?
  - From: Kurt Roeckx

References:
- Re: [openssl-project] Late thoughts on the 1.1.1 release - are we fooling ourselves?
  - From: Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd

Prev by Date: Re: SSL_CTX ignores many X509_STORE fields and uses own fields
Next by Date: Re: [openssl-project] Late thoughts on the 1.1.1 release - are we fooling ourselves?
Previous by thread: Re: [openssl-project] Late thoughts on the 1.1.1 release - are we fooling ourselves?
Next by thread: Re: [openssl-project] Late thoughts on the 1.1.1 release - are we fooling ourselves?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux