I'm just dealing with trying to get openssl 1.1.0 to get installed on Ubuntu
bionic. Yes, there is a package, but all the other packages depend upon
1.0.x.... and many things are linking against 1.0.x rather than 1.1, when
both are installed... I don't know why they build stuff against 1.0.x
rather than 1.1.0: I think it's a packaging oops.
In the "I'm guessing this is NOT news to anyone HERE" category ....
Even the packages that DO 'build against' 1.1.0 frequently do so by
banking on deprecated symbols made possible by lazy (imo) api-compat usage.
Packagers are frequently NOT cleaning up their openssl version-check
logic, and cleaning out old-/deprecated- symbols. In my experience,
most seem not to be interested, either; instead, the response mantra to
entreaties about clean/modern "--api=1.1.0" compatibility is "that's not
what the distros provide; just use that".
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
