> On Jul 31, 2018, at 4:59 AM, Matt Caswell <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > To be clear I can only think of one leak that we have at process exit > (well technically its two instances of the same thing). And that leak is > not the result of a *mistake*. It is a deliberate design decision to > workaround around a problem on some platforms (i.e. anything that isn't > Windows, Linux or Solaris, IIRC). There's at least one more, we don't call X509_PURPOSE_cleanup(), without which we leak memory allocated via X509_PURPOSE_add(). There may be other static allocations that the test suite does not exercise. -- Viktor. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
