Re: command passwd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/07/2018 21:02, Carl-Valentin Schmitt wrote:
Up to recent time it was that Command passwd involved mcrypt. Right?

Will soon OpenSSL substitute mcrypt?
Or is OpenSSL too big for this?

I guess you are referring to the libmcrypt, a cryptographic
library which is kind of an alternative to OpenSSL's
"libcrypto" (formerly libeay).

I also presume this is about the OS level "passwd" command
in some *N*X system, like Linux or BSD.

If so, this would be up to the maintainers of that system
command on that *N*X OS distribution to decide if they want
to switch from using libmcrypt to using the OpenSSL 1.1.x's
libcrypto to implement the standard cryptographic primitives
involved in the *N*X password hashing schemes.

In practice it should also be noted that there are often
additional layers behind the passwd(1) command, such as PAM
and libcrypt (no O or M).  So the actual decision to use
libmcrypt, libcrypto or any other library would probably be
up to the maintainer of that lower system layer.

Enjoy

Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S.  https://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark.  Direct +45 31 13 16 10
This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded

--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux