Re: Deployment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Another good question.

I believe from the information I have been provided that 0.9.8za fixes the issues previously described for 0.9.8h, on SLES 11 SP1 (apparently).
(Unless I am missing something here - highly possible?)

Dean Warren 

-----Original Message-----
From: openssl-users <openssl-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Michael Wojcik
Sent: 16 July 2018 15:27
To: openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  Deployment

> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Warren
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 03:32
> To: openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  Deployment
>
> Yeah that does sounds scary.
> I will look into vendors options.

Also - why 0.9.8za? That's *ancient*. This seems like a lot of work for a result of rather dubious value. What problem are you trying to solve?

--
Michael Wojcik
Distinguished Engineer, Micro Focus


--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users



SCISYS UK Limited. Registered in England and Wales No. 4373530.
Registered Office: Methuen Park, Chippenham, Wiltshire SN14 0GB, UK.
 
Before printing, please think about the environment.

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux